Remember The Fourth Tunnel: Think Rat
Rats have long been the animal of choice for scientistic sadists wishing to understand human behaviour. Rat brains, it seems, are wired in a very similar way to our own. Also, rodents are a lot less cute than say, chimps or gorillas. Scientists, therefore, can abuse, torture and kill any number of rats without attracting much criticism. But what has emerged from some of these experiments -if correct- makes ominous reading as regards the future of human societies. We may need to think rat.
But what, you may ask, has this got to do with the price of gender-reassignment surgery in post-covid Europe? How will this help us overcome the satanic authors of the Reset and the New World Order?
Well, hang around and I'll try to explain. Starting at the bottom, as I always seem to, there was the infamous 'scientific study' where captive rats were given a lever to push that would trigger an orgasm. After some intial suspicion, the rats invariably got hooked and hastened to wank themselves to death. (There is no reason to assume the scientists who arranged this had some perverse desire to watch small animals commiting jerk-off suicide. But you do wonder.)
The hideous nature of this experiment was surpressed and the original data is to this day near-impossible to find. It was however, repeated many times in slightly different ways, often using levers which delivered not sexual stimulation but a strong dose of mind-altering drugs, notably heroin. As you would imagine, plenty of innocent rats died in the testing process. [CLICK HERE to read about the infamous 'Rat Park' experiment]
Unfair as it is to draw cross-species comparisons, it's also irresistible. Bear in mind, the justification for those gory experiments was the remarkable similarity of rat and human brains. Have you ever observed a group of millennials sat in a huddle prodding smartphones with their thumbs? Picture a rat, thumping a lever with it's pink paw. Think of a masturbating rat, off its face on on smack. What is the logical consequence of repetitive, monotonous self-stimulus in dopamine-addicted humans?
THE NUMBERS GAME
In the nineteen sixties, when state-sponsored rat-abuse was probably at its peak, mice and rats were gathered in large populations, given an unlimited supply of food, and a large, but not unlimited supply of suitable space to occupy. What followed was both predictable, and ghastly. First came a population explosion. Next came a a rapid descent into collective psychosis, in which all social norms (which rodents most certainly have) were discarded. Males attacked each other without warning with escalating ferocity, often after trivial disputes over territory or status. Females were gang-raped and slaughtered. Litters of baby rats were abandoned by their mothers and not infrequently killed and eaten.
Can you think of any place you know where things are getting a bit like that? I certainly can; I've lived in two or three of them. Do you think the current Home Secretary is aware of the experiment described above? Do rats shit in the sewer?
SAY CHEESE
But another, slightly complicated experiment was, to me, the most telling of its kind. Being respectable, qualified scientists, the rat-torturers of the sixties realised that in order to think rat properly, you needed to think cheese. So they created a rough dungeons & dragons scenario designed to examine the forces of motivation. What gets rats out of bed in the morning?
The organisers presented their subject -a healthy, peckish rat- with four seemingly identical tunnels. A morsel of cheese was placed at the end of tunnel #4. One tunnel at a time, the rat explored its environment until discovering the cheese, which it ate. The subject was then removed from the tunnel complex. After a spell of solitary confinement, sleep and pleasant rat-dreams, the rat was re-introduced to the experimental environment.
FOUR LEGS GOOD
Returned to the complex, the rat would immediately head down the fourth tunnel, and sure enough, find its reward. Repeated at length, the subject's cheese-hunting behaviour was observed to be both logical and practical. There was, however, a deliberate twist in the otherwise random sequence of cheese-apparitions. Sometimes there was no cheese in any tunnel.
From their behaviour, it became apparent that rats were largely indifferent the exact location of the cheese. Having wised-up to the phenomenon that cheese quite often existed in tunnel #4, they would hurry down that path in expectation. But in the final stage of the experiment, when the reward was moved out of tunnel #4 to other tunnels, the rats instantly adapted to this development and never ceased their relentless pursuit of the cheese.
TWO LEGS BAD
Human subjects were then presented with the same reward-finding dilemmas. An incentive was placed in one of four possible locations : tunnels were not actually necessary -corridors or doors would do, or sealed boxes. As with the rats, the choices and hunt-processes of the human subjects were carefully monitored and analysed. To the surprise of the organisers, these experiments highlighted a strange quirk of human nature which was conspicuously missing in rodents.
Humans would prioritise the search for cheese at the location where it previously appeared, much more often than rats faced with the same sequences. When the reward was, after repeated appearances in the same place, shifted elsewhere, humans would notably persist in searching the original location longer than any rat. The experiments were performed often enough that the results were, it was claimed, statistically beyond coincidence.
There arose a consensus among the analysts that this was a genuine phenomenon - i.e. human subjects would, in their minds, create a concept regarding the 'cheese' that actually made it take longer for them to find the re-located rewards. Rats just concentrated on the vital business of getting fed. Rats would not be distracted while pursuing cheese, wherever the hell it appeared. Humans, on the other hand, felt there must be a logic or a meaning behind appearance of the cheese in one location as opposed to another.
RED WHITE OR BLUE?
Now there are various ways to look at this. A kind interpretation would be to say that rats are dumb and we are smart. That we have, as a species, evolved to the point where satisfaction cannot be complete without understanding the framework in which satisfaction exists. That we are in fact, at least one important step beyond the selfish, animalistic desire to consume above all else. (This theory, by the way, does not accoiunt for the existence of creatures like the human land-whale who sold me a bottle of whisky at Tesco on Monday).
Unfortunately, an equally credible interpretation is that well-fed humans are easily seduced by an innate desire to find complications in even the simplest, most straightforward issue, and seek for vital, undiscovered truths which may not exist at all, even when the search may actively mitigate against our chances of satisfaction. Rather than stick to the point and focus on pursuing the cheese itself, we're also prepared to pursue a reason for cheese. Buried somewhere in our brains is the idea that by understanding what lies behind cheese, we may get more of it. Our faith in the cheese is more important than the cheese.
And here, I suggest, is the key to the social-engineering techniques of 2022. The carnival of gibbering maniacs talking insane babble that we call 'politicians', is no more than a swarm of immature, semi-educated fat-guzzlers who have never known hunger. With egos as bloated as their salaries, they obsess on inventing imaginary reasons for the cheese they assume we are all lusting after. This wish-list is what they call a manifesto. Cheese will appear, they explain, if we just get enough [DIVERSITY OFFICERS / LGBTQ ZEBRA CROSSINGS / VEGAN SHOES / TRANS-FRIENDLY NUDE BEACHES / LABORATORY STEAK / SOLAR PANELS / UKRANIAN SHEEPDOGS] (tick where applicable).
Once begun, this journey across the landscape of imagination expands into a wild, aimless thrashing on the economic Sahara known as government spending. When the solution to everything is imaginary cheese, it's only logical to purchase that solution with imaginary money. Everything will work out fine if enough taxpayers can be persuaded to believe that the imaginary cheese is on its way -and it generally appears that they can. A stupendously large number of people will simply go hungry rather than look elsewhere when the source of cheese begins to dry up.
Meanwhile, deep in his bomb-proof undergound lair, the Rat King and his Rat Court are sprawled on thrones of finest Stilton, drinking wine from Gouda goblets and tossing bricks of Cathedral City Cheddar to the sharp-toothed mice guarding the entrance to the Fourth Tunnel.
This may well explain the phenomenon of ‘Human Rights’.
ReplyDeleteA desperate desire of some humans to find symptoms of reason, logic, and meaning behind everything that occurs both on the planet and beyond it, no matter how obviously random.
‘Human Rights’ is a concept invented by the French philosophers of the eighteenth century ‘Enlightenment’. It is a purely man-made concept, and only a concept - with NO ACTUAL PHYSICAL EXISTENCE anywhere outside of anyone’s head.
But it is a wonderful, unique tool for generating income for lawyers (just as mystical religions did the same for priests), and has thus become something that everyone in the West has been taught to take for granted. Indeed, not only does every social and political micro-sub-section of society now have its very own exhaustive catalogue of ‘rights’, but identical ‘rights’ have been somehow ‘Identified’ amongst animals – especially cuddly or perceived-to-be-cuddly ones – and for all I know, plants.
And to top it all, what we used to call ‘weather’, but are now brusquely instructed to call ’The Environment’, also appears to have ‘rights’, which we are all guilty of attacking, and apparently have a sacred duty to preserve unchanged.
Undoubtedly this human fear of the random, lethal, totally conscience-free brutality that nature itself in all its non-human manifestations has unvaryingly exhibited, not only throughout recorded history but for untold millions of years before, is the underlying factor behind all organized religions. Of which the Green religion is only the latest manifestation.
However, as the last of the rat experiments you cite shows, such philosophical luxuries do not long survive the breakdown of any society.
Pass the Stilton, please...
Oh yes indeed - 'human rights' is the very embodiment of imaginary cheese. Shocked by our own inability to actually control the universe, we dream up another one, place chains on the products of our minds and shout 'Look! We're in charge!' Brains before bread. Forget the chessboard -where's the cheeseboard?
Delete