Why Britain's 2024 Election is Rigged

 

Modern elections are very carefully organised to keep us powerless no matter how we vote. The ‘free world’ is run by people who are never elected and cannot be voted out. Vote-winners very soon discover they are servants of the higher powers. Democracy is an illusion because the left and right are merely two wings on a dead albatross. My thoughts, in a teacup.

But you probably don’t want to believe that, and will instead spend a lot of this year -and the next- comparing the relative merits of miss left and mister right or vice versa. In this post I will try to explain why that’s a waste of time, using the specific case of the British General Election of 2024 which hasn’t happened yet. On the principle that our ‘democratic process’ is no more than a theatrical illusion I will predict the real outcome of the election, and the real consequences that will follow.

Although worthless as an instrument of change, British elections always achieve their purposes which are:

1. To concentrate public attention on the established political parties.

2. Act as ‘lightning conducter’ by allowing a tiny amount of discontent to be ‘broadcast’.

3. Create a convincing imitation of potential radical change.

The bedrock of the democratic illusion is that the election is very important. If this was true, it would be easy to prove. We could look at recent history and see what happened after elections. The effects should be obvious. We should see important changes, and clear differences in the before & after state of the nation. Let’s go back 25 years.

Example #1 Gold Reserves

In the final year of of the 20th century Britain had 715 tonnes of gold in the Bank of England. On May 7th 1999 the government announced it intended to sell over half of that amount. In the next couple of years, 395 tonnes were sold, at an average price of $276 an ounce. This was -and still is- a controversial decision, but one look at the chart below tells us that ditching gold was already Britain’s well-established policy.

The gold Britain flogged in 1999 at $276 per ounce is, as I write these words, trading at $2178 per ounce. In other words, about $26 billion profit went west. Gold has never been at a higher price than it is today.

That “blunder” is invariably laid at the door of the 1999 Chancellor Gordon Brown. But in the 25 years since, not one British government has made any attempt to re-invest in gold. It is my belief that all of the regimes since 1999 have been been acting solely in the interests of globalist power-groups, rather than the interests of British people. For 25 years there have been no meaningful gold assets in reserve to protect the country from a global economic crash, despite six general elections and seven Prime Ministers. When that crash arrives -as it certainly will- Britain will effectively collapse.

PREDICTION: After the 2024 election the British government will make no investment in gold reserves.

Britain has a little over 300 tonnes of gold reserves. America, Germany, Italy, France, Russia and China all measure their gold reserves in thousands of tonnes. How many of these countries have enjoyed profitable trade with Britain during the last quarter-century? Answer: all of them. They are all major shareholders in essential British infrastructure, and British voters have no influence whatsoever on these relationships or their consequences. Which leads us neatly to…

Example #2 Energy Supply

In 1999 Britain’s Labour government was (according to its election manifesto) opposed to nuclear power. In 2006 Tony Blair did a swift U-turn, announcing “the facts have changed.” In 2008 his government committed to invest in a new generation of nuclear power plants. After Labour lost the 2010 general election, a newly elected Conservative government under David Cameron announced a list of sites for constructing those very power plants.

The first is now under way: The Hinckley Point nuclear reactor is being built in Somerset. The project is financed by EDF Energy and China General Nuclear Power Group (CGN) That is, France and China. The second plant is Sizewell C, where construction will begin later this year; also financed by EDF & CGN. The third -Bradwell B in Essex- is still at the planning stage: plans prepared by EDF and CGN. France and China are our nuclear patrons.

Post-Covid, the government claims to be ‘unsure’ about having China in charge of Britain’s future energy needs. Some might say this poses the most important dilemma since the second world war. But the British public will not be consulted either way.

PREDICTION: After the 2024 election the nuclear construction program will continue.

Chinese investment will only be rejected if another gold-rich foreign power-group(s) is ready to step in. But whatever the flavour of Britain’s post-election regime, the country’s energy future will be nuclear, and in foreign hands.

Example #3 Immigration

All numbers below are ‘official’ and therefore officially shrunken to appear smaller.

25 years ago in 1999 Britain took in 454,000 immigrants. By 2009 that rose to 591,000. The following year the government switched from left to right (allegedly), but in 2019 the number was up to 788,000. By 2022 the number reached 1,234,000. [Source: Statista]

During these 25 years Britain had six general elections and seven different Prime Ministers. Not one election resulted in a slowdown of immigration -quite the opposite. Every election, regardless of the individuals elected, was followed by a large increase in immigration, in blatant disregard of the public will.

PREDICTION: After the 2024 election immigration will see another large increase.

The so-called Parliament of Britain is completely under the control of foreign business interests, who have budgets wildly higher than any home-grown British organisations. They view indigenous white people as an obstacle to their ambitions, so Britons are being systematically outnumbered, by design.

SUMMARY

It’s hard to imagine three more crucial concerns regarding Britain’s future than the national gold reserves, the national energy supply and the overwhelming scale of immigration. Unless tightly controlled, all three can trigger devasting impacts on the economy, inflation, industry, utility bills, employment, housing and health care. Yet, as demonstrated above, the British people have had no say in how these crunch issues are handled.

For a quarter of a century -one entire generation- these matters have been beyond our control, their outcomes decided by foreign powers. Why on earth would the 2024 election result in the British public being prioritised? Neither gold nor the wildly ambitious nuclear power program are even being discussed with regard to the upcoming election. As for immigration, both the left and right sides of government will sneer as they ram millions more immigrants into Britain no matter what. To call this ‘democracy’ is a bad joke.

ELECTION-FIXING TECHNIQUES

I could fill a book under this heading although there would be little point. Nevertheless, a lot of effort, sound and fury will inevitably be generated on behalf of those who want to ride the 2024 political gravy-train. The process plays out as follows:

Top Dogs

We may as well begin at the peak of the pyramid. Politics is an attractive job for self-centred psychopaths, and Britain has a few dozen ‘safe seats’ where a ruthless donkey could get elected wearing the right rosette. Becoming a ‘safe seat’ MP is a job where performance has no relation to pay. These gigs ‘belong’ to the left or right and everyone knows it. The safest seats of all are reserved for people with powerful business backers: Theresa May was given one such constituency as a reward for services to the Bank of England. Sajid Javid ditto for the Deutschebank. Rishi Sunak’s dad-in-law is a corporate billionaire: say hello to ‘the MP for Richmond, Yorkshire.’ In 2014 the current Labour leader and prime-minister-to-be Sir Kier Starmer was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath for services to Freemasonry the legal profession. Instantly reborn as a politician, he was appointed MP for Holborn & St Pancras a year later. it’s a grand life at the top.

Yuppy Puppies and the Third Way

But for a determined tyke who wants no more than a place on the back benches, elections can be rigged in various ways. Postal voting is by far the easiest route to swinging a close-run ballot. There are fifty ways to fake a postal vote, with print-your-own being the most efficient. Exceedingly popular among Pakistani and muslim communities (their origin countries specialise in electoral fraud) postal fraud grows more widespread with every election. In extremis, the vote count can be prolonged until sufficient votes are manufactured. As proved by President Joe Biden.

A recurring idea that enervates those who cling to the mirage of voting their way out of trouble is “the third party”. In this fantasy, a genuine, sincerely-motivated new party appears to sweep away the established devils of right and left alike. In my lifetime this creature has reared its head repeatedly -and been decapitated every time.

The ‘third party’ is actually a handy tool for the mainstream manipulators. Third-party candidates are often inserted into a closely-run vote to muddy the water in favour of one side in particular. Each new one is either purpose-built to fail by the Uniparty, or immediately infiltrated if spawned independently of the system. Mature readers will recall the litany of ignominious third-party retreats.

Britain’s late-20th century Liberal Party collapsed after its top dogs were outed amid tabloid allegations of homosexual blackmail, hit-men and alcoholism. The subsequent ‘Lib-Dem’ coalition was a charade -a desperate hodge-podge of career politicians ‘defecting’ from right and left. This morphed into a gooey soft-centre that was swallowed whole when the big Asian money arrived and bought out the Conservatives.

UKIP and its bastard son the Brexit Party were scorned, then impolitely applauded, then craftily persuaded into self-neutering negotiations. These were invariably accepted by the shrewd career compromiser Nigel Farage, whose real talents are for self-promotion and survival.

The repulsive entity known as the SNP has just enjoyed its five minutes in the electoral sun, but looks set for the dustbin of history. Being from the outset an ugly crew of graspers, chancers and juveniles, their fake-nationalist scam is imploding like a cardboard submarine.

For the 2024 edition of “Third Party Option” a host of disgruntled voters already have their eyes fixed on the Reform party. Their solemn-faced leader Richard Tice, however, is already appearing on radio and TV mouthing suspiciously vague populist dissent, interspersed with platitudes about ‘trans rights’ and the non-existent virtues of mass-migration. Which should tell fans all they need to know. Reform candidates will be strategically deployed around the country by their anonymous financial backers to do the least harm while creating the maximum fuss. Look, everyone -there really is an alternative! Even if Reform scrambled home in front in one or more constituencies, that would not trouble the forces of global finance for an instant. In Britain’s Uniparty regime, independents do nothing but draw their salary and smile for the cameras.

It’s not a pleasure to repeat my long-held convictions, but nothing can persuade me that the 2024 general election will achieve anything at all except to confirm the social-media ambitions of the successful grass-roots candidates. The real game, I fear, is being played somewhere else.

Ian Andrew-Patrick

Many thanks to readers for supporting 99EndOf. Please visit our new Substack website at the link above. Our aim is to spread the links and information as far and wide as possible. Please do help whenever you can.

99endof supports no political party or ideology. The individual is what matters here, and the freedoms for which we are now obliged to fight.