BRITAIN TODAY: COMMUNIST TORTURE & CHEMICAL RAPE


In 1956 the psychologist Albert Biderman made a detailed study of the torture methods used in foreign (communist) countries, to break the will of captured prisoners_______________________

Comments

  1. Very well argued. I am taken aback by your close correlation of government measures with documented communist mind control torture. It is very suggestive and disturbing. However, you may have jumped to unproven conclusions at end in accusing WHO and the elderly Bill Gates of being the real powers. I am afraid they remain anonymous. They are somewhere in the nexus of the deep state and global corporate power.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Only to the ignorant. These techniques were known and used by police and secret agencies in the so-called West.

      Delete
  2. There's a highly entertaining 'double act' currently onstage at the Palace of Wastemonster - the 'Boris & Keir Show'.

    BloJo announces another raft of repression, Starmer immediately demands something even more draconian, thus making B look 'moderate' in comparison.
    In a few months time Johnson will announce vaccine passports; Starmer will demand compulsory vaccination. Later Johnson will announce detention without trial for Lockdown violators; Starmer will immediately demand the death penalty.

    Classic 'Good Cop, Bad Cop' tactics on the part of the UniParty. The punters will, as usual, lap it up.

    Meanwhile the NHS, the Royal College of Physicians, the SAGE crooks are all acting as though they've been taken totally by surprise by the very same 'Surge' in winter respiratory aliments THEY have spent the last five months endlessly warning US about. Despite all NHS trusts employing 'Resilience Planners' to plan for all such eventualities.

    But then it's rather odd that MSM reporters are, for whatever reason, refraining from showing the public any pictures or reports from inside any of these supposedly 'overwhelmed' hospitals - despite courageous members of the public demonstrating on social media just how easy it is to gain access to, and video, empty hospitals on their mobiles. And then, er, being arrested for their pains.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So a National health Service that absorbs 20% of national Government expenditure every year, is ‘Overwhelmed’ by a disease that currently hospitalises 26,467 people (latest ONS figure, for 05/01/21) in England, a country with a population of 56 million.

    On the ONS statistics, there are 484 English hospitals listed, with a total of 141,000 beds according to The King’s Fund statistics. This has fallen from 400,000 beds in 1974. Obviously a proportion of hospitals are specialists (Moorfields etc) which will not be taking Covid patients.

    If you continue to believe that the NHS is currently being ‘Overwhelmed’, after deciding to specialise in treating just one disease and one only, then the above should demonstrate clearly to you that the much-vaunted NHS, the one remaining national institution that we are still told to be proud of, is actually in no respect ‘fit for purpose’, and does not give value for money. And that the Health policy of every government since 1974 has been a disaster.

    But if, in the light of the above figures, you are sceptical about whether the NHS is in reality being 'Overwhelmed', there is another, highly disturbing, possibility. A possibility set out very convincingly by the author of this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This makes for chilling reading ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find it utterly chilling to be alive in this unprecedented nightmare.

      Delete
  5. Great points Sir, but.....

    strange thing is, in these times, if you argue for human liberty and the exercise of individual intelligence and responsibility, with the right to discus and make choices that respond to reality, you are instantly labelled a deranged ultra-extremist motivated entirely by hate and bigotry.

    Is it generational? My sample youth, my step son, highly rational and intelligent in his own field, came back from University a Zombie, hostile to any discourse beyond his field.

    Zero curiosity, zero calm analysis, zero tolerance for rational debate, automatic condemnation of any authentic (vrs media manufactured) experience, hostility to real world data, to history.

    Instead, there's this "Woke" belief in racial determinism and the existence of systemic "hate"-motivated conspiracy theories - backed by sympathy to political street violence - that hasn't been seen in the democracies since 1945.

    Primitive to the max.

    There's zero consistency in Woke. Yes OK, he likes to sneak out for a McD's hamburger (we all enjoy our sins). Yet, he'll preach on about 'Veganism' and climate change whenever his mother lovingly cooks his old (healthy) favourites.

    Veganism preached by a man who at 23 still won't eat the vegetables on this plate! But to point that out is beastly?

    Perhaps it's a complex form of sulking. All about reaching for power and control. Maybe that's always been natural itch in youth.

    So, it bolsters his ego to condemn everything that's been learned and valued outside his brief adult life - but in terms of civilisation that's really throwing the baby out, handing the distressed infant over to the creepiest chancers in politics.

    Yes, while the engine of 'Woke' may be scarcely more than calculated, trolling by the most privileged (and thus self-centred) generation ever - Harry and Megan mode - unfortunately, the destination is ignorance and tyranny.

    Junk logic - it was once on full display in cigarette advertising - and of course, targeted to young minds .

    The creeps would ask "hey fascist dad, why shouldn't youth aspire to racing cars, yachts, movie-stars, cowboy and international jet-set lifestyles? Stop stealing their hope, fascist dad!"

    The real issues, the drug dependence, the ill-health, the profiteering from misery, THE CANCER? Hey, not cool to mention, fascist dad....

    Yes, the very media/advertising creeps that once pushed cancer onto children now work to push cancerous politics onto a passive public. And they make dam sure that questioning their cancer is "not cool". and "de-platformed"

    The first thing every 'idealistic' regime does when it gains influence is to make lots of arbitrary rules - and go hell-for-leather installing it's terror apparatus, it's propaganda control, it's slave state infrastructure.

    Always, the first thing.... name one that hasn't? The grandiose 'idealism' is never more than jam tomorrow - a smoke screen for slavery.

    Yes, the good-citizen sheep are being fleeced by "light touch" Hitler-Stalinism. The elements are there, but they seem to come coincidentally, from the ether, rather than from a centralised political apparatus. It's called opportunistic collusion, and while it's driven by a tiny group of insiders it also appears amorphous, phantom-like, but non the less very real.

    We can still be grateful there are no mass slaughter houses. Yet what's eerie, is that it really does feel as if the sheep can be talked and bullied into anything by those with their hands of the levers of "virtual reality". Technology makes it ever more likely, monitoring and feeding propaganda words to all those sheep who feel clever when baaa-baaaing the loudest.

    Yes, while parents are gaslighted about endless "burning issues", like "gender-fluidity', the creeps are indeed demolishing our civilisation and selling it off as junk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many thanks for sharing your thought Smiff! You have my sympathy in particular as regards the experience of having your step-son returned from the Indoctrination Camp laden with the full baggage of Wokery. Perhaps the very worst of many sins committed in the name of education has been the calculated destruction of our cultural pride. It's all too east to nudge youth towards the cult of destruction, as destruction is so much easier than creation.
      I was struck by your closing remark about virtual reality, as I'm in the middle of writing a post speculating on the outer limts of what could -and probably will- be palmed of on an increasingly gullible public. Truly, we're in the age of unreason, and I thank the fates that steered my early decision never to become a parent. I really wouldn't wish the evolving world on any innocent child. Regards, Ian A-P.

      Delete
  6. So We Will Just Walk Off The Cliff Edge Then ? Look.s Like It.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really hope we don't, but it's hard to remain optimistic when vast numbers of people seem to be quite okay with a rapid slide into State tyranny. I'm beginning to realise I overestimated my fellow citizens.

      Delete
  7. Lost my job , home, family in less than a year to a hoax.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

More from 99EndOf