Freemasons in Government : Secret Society or Criminal Cronies?
Just across the road from where I live is the car park of the Cooperative supermarket. On the rear of an adjacent building hangs the sign pictured above. Although a second placard states: "SOCIAL CLUB -Brethren & Guests Welcome," the message is crystal clear, if you're in the know. The building is a Masonic Lodge; a members-only meeting house. If you knew nothing about Freemasons, I cannot imagine how this sign could be interpreted, except perhaps as the latest scores in an amateur cricket tournament.
Which just about sums up the clandestine nature of the masons. If you're in the club, you know what outsiders don't, and that is the whole point. Secrecy is the freemasons raison d'etre. If the organisation was not a cloak for corruption, it would be open and transparent in all its dealings. Instead, freemasonry has the ceremonial trappings of a religion, the arrogance of an exclusive men's club, and a strict internal hierarchy that mimics the Mafia-model pyramid of 'respect'.
A full-blown, thorough investigation of everything within Freemasonry is by definition, a genuine waste of time. Any attempt to nail down the centuries-long evolution of the cult is doomed, because almost all the interesting questions about freemasons generate unverifiable answers. Meanwhile, almost all the publicly available information is self-penned by masonic public relations stooges. Like every fraudster, freemasonry goes by a variety of names: The Craft / Brethren / Brotherhood for example.
Various aspects of masonic origins are "shrouded in mystery" (according to themselves) and to an outsider, the difference between one Lodge full of loons and another can only be approached (let alone understood) by first acquiring a large and very clumsy new vocabulary. To make matters worse, when masonic language is spoken aloud, the speaker invariably sounds like a stoned warlock who just arrived in the 21st century via a 300 year-old worm-hole bisecting Time and Space. One traditional way of asserting your membership was to state -with a straight face- that you were "on the square".
You can't help noticing how closely the formalities, rituals and vocabulary of freemasonry resemble the foibles of nerds playing Dungeons and Dragons online, or 'gamers' who wage digital warfare in imaginary alternative universes complete with multi-dimensional layers and half-human monsters.
With masons and gamers alike, the phrase "arrested development" springs to mind. To give just one cheesey example, according to the Cryptic Council website, freemasons in England can be awarded four degrees, namely: Select Master, Royal Master, Most Excellent Master, and Super Excellent Master. [to check out the Cryptic Council for yourself CLICK HERE]
We might expect this kind of verbal diaorrhea from teenagers, not grown adults. And yet, in the other-world context of a small Scottish island, it's easy enough to picture the newly-exalted degree holder Angus P MacDuff bursting through his front door, a six-pack of Special Brew trembling in his hands, chest heaving in excitement, to declare "We've hit the jackpot hen! As of tonight yer livin' wi a Super Excellent Master!"
And yes, the Brethren actually use the word "exalted" every time somebody like Angus gets legged up the ladder towards the Ultimate Grand Bum Chum of Monster Excellence.
Although clearly fascinated by fancy titles and pompous words, most masons I have known struggle when tasked with using the English language to convey precise information or deliver a simple explanation of their club activities. This isn't surprising, however, as freemasonic language -like the vocabulary of Woke- is really a method for concealing information and disguising the sordid truth.
To even get a whiff of what these fellows really get up to when they're all comfy together behind locked doors, you have to tunnel through an Everest of grandiose verbiage and self-promotion. Believe me, when it comes to virtue-signalling, social justice warriors could learn a thing or two from the masons.
Try and get a Select Master onto the subject of, say, the whopping cash backhanders the average freemasonic local Councillor can trouser in return for doling out planning permissions at the Lodge. Instead, you'll hear a ten-minute speech on the subject of how the brotherhood devotes every spare minute to eager fundraising for homeless people, handicapped children and vulnerable adults. According to your friendly neighbourhood freemason, every mason's life is a monument to charity. (To which the correct response is: "You mean, like Jimmy Saville?")
Which brings us, necessarily, to the embedded criminal element in all human societies, and the reasons why wrongdoers are irresistibly drawn towards the collective power of institutions. Power attracts all the damaged brains; psychopaths, sociopaths, thieves and pedophiles in particular. That's why so many of the most apalling crimes are comitted by doctors, lawyers, police, civil servants and politicians. It's also the reason why these professions are crammed with freemasons who, behind closed doors, swear an oath that commits them to support, promote and defend the interests of any fellow Mason who requests help.
Masonic self-interest was rife in the Glasgow of my childhood, where the local Lodges were widely percieved to be an established network of near-insurmountable obstacles in the path of non-masons with ambitions in business, law, or politics. Masons were the establishment. My father was a wages clerk in a steel factory for the lasty twenty-odd years of his life. Articulate, literate and numerate, a decorated RAF veteran with a university degree, he remained stuck in his minor office job till his death in 1978, due to his refusal to join the Lodge which controlled the factory, and his open contempt for freemasonry in general. Thousands of other working-class Glaswegians were in the same position, and suffered the same way. There's no reason to assume this scenario was not replicated in factories in every city in Britain.
On the other hand, there is every reason to assume the police stations of Scotland, England and Wales have been -for over a century- the front line of defence for freemasons engaged in criminal activities. I could fill a book with true stories of criminal masons evading justice with the very specific help of masonic police, barristers, magistrates and judges. It would be bad enough if the scams concerned were all of the cash-in-a-bag nature indulged by masonic councillors. But the gravity of the masonic oath bears heavily on those who swear allegiance, and the Brethren never fails to close ranks in support of masons accused of some of the worst crimes imaginable.
The knowledge that such a support system exists is a green-light for pedophiles. Any man with a penchant for child-rape lives in fear of exposure and prosecution. Such individuals would be stupid to overlook the advantages freemasons enjoy when these kind of allegations are made. When a sizeable cadre of the police force itself has sworn an oath in secret to come to the aid of any mason requesting help, a masonic pedophile can go to court with a choice of credible (police) witnesses lined up in his corner. Beyond the the boys in blue, the chances are quite high that the judge or judges hearing the case will be masonic too.
For as long as I can remember, large numbers of high-ranking politicians and lawyers have been repeatedly and credibly accused of child-abuse. Nevertheless only a fraction come to trial, and only a handful go to jail. Whether we like it or not, in the corridors of european and American power, political pedophilia is an institution to rival royalty itself.
In 2018 the Guardian newspaper reported the existence of two masonic lodges operating within the walls of the Houses of Parliament. One - the New Welcome Lodge is for MPs, peers and their staff. This lodge (No.5139) was 'consecrated' in 1929. According to historians at St Andrews University it " was intended from the start as a 'class lodge' for Labour MPs and officials which would assist relations between the new Labour government and Freemasonry." [details HERE] The second Westminster lodge -the Gallery Lodge- is for so-called 'political journalists' who are granted special access to Parliament. In practise, this means they are masonic pet-poodles, who write whatever they are instructed to write and nothing else.
Both lodges are believed to be still operating as usual, although the paranoia which greets any inquiry into political freemasonry means almost nothing is ever confirmed.
To many, myself included, it seems borderline incredible that Members of Parliament are not required to at least register their masonic memberships. This an insult to the voting public. Why on earth should so-called public servants be participating in meetings of a secret society which requires them to prioritise their own mutual interests above anyone else's?
As we have reported before [HERE] the standard practice for covering up the criminal activities of British politicians is to launch an inquiry, which proceeds like a snail, is deaf and blind, and drags on indefinitely until all the relevant crooks are dead or near as. A prime example of this is the IICSA -Independent Inquiry Into Child Sex Abuse- set up in July 2014 by then Home Secretary Theresa May and still going. ("Independent" as in completely controlled by government-appointed officials).
The timing and the nature of this non-inquiry is a testament to how establishment insiders view every crisis as an opportunity. In 2014, the British public were reeling in horror as waves from the Jimmy Saville scandal began breaking upon the steps of Parliament. In June 2014, Patrick Rock - one of David Cameron's senior aides- was charged with downloading child-abuse imagery.
Rock's job had been to advise the PM on 'filtering online pornography'. My own sources have suggested Rock's prosecution was merely the opening shot in May's personal campaign to oust Cameron and become Prime Minister herself. One month after Rock's arrest, she loudly launched her "Independent Child-Abuse Inquiry" and you can bet your last dollar there were plenty of nervous MPs ringing their lawyers. Behind the scenes, however, deals were done, prices paid and promises made. May would, as we know, achieve her ambition within two years.
Eight years later, that inquiry is still creeping sideways to nowhere with all the verve and protective camouflage of a legless chameleon. Remember, the IICSA was (ostensibly) set up in response to public outcry after the lid finally came off the Saville can of worms. Saville's network of contacts among police and royalty pointed to a bag of equally extensive contacts inside Parliament. The inquiry was a sham, and succeeded only in disappearing the subject, while securing Theresa May's fifteen minutes of fame.
Having already published sixteen separate 'reports' the IISCA is due to expire deliver a 'final' report later this year -probably in mid-summer when Britain's MPs are on holiday abroad. May's interminable 'investigation' means British citizens have had the rare privilege of spectating for eight years on a pedophile-centred cover-up started by a pedophile-centred cover-up.
In a shrewd manoeuvre to take the heat off Parliament, after a lot of hot air and pant-wetting, May ensured the IISCA probe was framed to investigate not just MPs, but local councils and 'church organisations' as well. This, of course, simply trebled the amount of potential masonic support available to those accused of abusing children. The message was clear: close ranks or we'll take you down with us.
In June 2017, the group Survivors of Organised and Institutional Abuse (SOIA) withdrew their participation "with deep regret" describing the inquiry as "not fit for purpose". Survivors, they claimed, had been "totally marginalised" and the inquiry had descended into a "very costly academic report-writing and literature review exercise". I couldn't agree more.
A sample of the above popped up in February of 2020, when, after eight years of investigation, the IISCA announced that 'senior Conservative politicians' had repeatedly failed' to pass on rumours and allegations of pedophilia concerning Margaret Thatcher's bosom buddy, the flamboyant and (bet your boots) staunch freemason Sir Peter Morrison.
Rumours and allegations? In the late 80's there was hardly a rent-boy in London who couldn't have picked Morisson out of a line-up. Beyond that, his lust for sex with underage boys was recorded in Edwina Currie's autobiography in 2002. In any case, as Morrison had died way back in 1995 we see the typical arc of a pedophile poltician's career: immune from censure so long as they are still breathing.
The occasional -conspicuously historical- detail did, nevertheless, escape the mountains of unreadable waffle generated by the IISCA in its neverending quest to bury the dirt. We learned, for example, that in the 1970's the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) was funded by the Home Office for three years. So UK taxpayers were actually paying for the political kiddy-fiddlers information-hub. Of course, nobody under fifty was alive then, so who cares, right?
Wrong. The culture of pedophile "revelations" that only arrive on the back of the predator's funeral has to stop. The anti-climax of the Jeffrey Epstein affair demonstrated the lengths the establishment will go to when living child-abusers are on the brink of spilling the beans. Two of the last ten British Primisters have been alleged to be serial offenders who made a lifestyle out of performing criminal sexual acts with children. The depth and breadth of accusations against Conservative PM Edward Heath -during his lifetime and afterwards- go way past the point where the absence of a proper investigation was acceptable. But Heath's highly suspicious enthusiasms were excused, ignored and dismissed until he was safely dead and buried.
Conversely, when a handful of courageous individuals attempted to direct public attention towards certain well-sourced allegations regarding Prime Minister Gordon Brown, his foot-to-the-floor departure -from number 10, the Labour Party and the public sphere- was the fastest exit from public life achieved by any major politician in history who wasn't actually assassinated.
It may not be coincidental that Epstein-friendly Peter 'Mandy' Mandelson -a transparently corrupt enabler on both sides of the Atlantic- was effectively joined at the hip with the abominable Blair, who viewed Brown as his personal Achilles heel.
NB: one of the brave (independent) journalists central to unveiling the Brown allegations was, as a direct result, driven out of the UK by threats and warnings, and now lives in Germany. Readers will, hopefully, forgive me for the absence of further specifics in this commentary.
If the above seems to be straying from the theme of this article, bear in mind that Blair himself was a product of the inner-ring of elite British lawyers, where Freemasonry has -for a century- been almost compulsory for anyone with ambitions beyond the bottom rung of the ladder. As was Lord Bingham, the Law Lord who went 'blind for Blair' when the illegal rape and pillage of Iraq needed a "proper" legal excuse. (Bingham's daughter Kate would, by the way, in 2020, be appointed Britain's "vaccine czar" by Boris Johnson. This cosy in-house arrangement enabled the vaccine bonanza that made billionaires of Bingham's pharma-industry colleagues and cemented Johnson's credentials as a globalist puppet- (CLICK HERE and HERE for two of our detailed reports on that scam).
 |
| IMRAN KHAN MP |
Of course, not all pedophiles require the support of freemasons. This week in pedo-politics, we learned that recently convicted pedophile MP Imran Khan was -incredibly- appointed to serve on a government panel analysing the behaviour of grooming gangs. Priti Patel chose Khan (who had already been accused of sexually assulting a minor) for this panel. Its task was to produce a paper titled “Group-based child sexual exploitation characteristics of offending.”
I invite readers to re-read the above sentences, bearing in mind that the panel was created as a consequence of the Rotherham child-abuse scandal, which saw 1400 white victims gang-raped by Asian men. Curious place, Britain's Parliament, is it not? A child-abusing politician of Asian origin gets appointed by a politician of Asian origin to investigate child-abusers of Asian origin. Anybody spotting "characteristics of offending" here or is it just me? Incidentally, I seem to recall a certain Lord Nazir Ahmed being jailed a few weeks ago for attempted rape of a six-year-old girl and buggery of an 11 year-old boy. [Details HERE]
 |
| LORD AHMED |
Freemasonry, we are repeatedly told, is just a harmless, charity-supporting boys club which occasionally involves some mutual backscratching. Yet mutual backscratching is as vital to the political class as it is to apes in the rainforest. Westminster, like all parliaments, is a jungle, rife with cliques and cabals who seek safety in numbers and compete for the favours and protection of creatures higher in the pecking order. For this, if no other reason, elected politicians should be forbidden from holding secret meetings of a quasi-religious cult like Freemasonry.
Masonry is a uniquely debased modus operandi for elected officials, as the menu of self-centred masonic activities is far, far removed from the realm of innocent hobbies and shared enthusiasms. These people meet in rooms bristling with esoteric, magical symbols, to celebrate and enact ancient rituals, don costumes and swear binding oaths of loyalty in the name of a Supreme Being. No amount of fat cheques presented by plump masons to Save the Children can paper over the sinister and secretive side of masonry that make it both seductive and so clearly dangerous.
As we have learned, government openly longs to read our every text and email, record every conversation, track our smallest movements, record every second of our public behaviour, and censor our thoughts, speech and written exchanges. When we refuse to comply with their surveillance panopticon, we are scolded: if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear. Why then, do the government's freemasons gather in secret like thieves? Possibly because they have so very much to lose.
 |
| NEIL PARISH MP |
This week the Right Honourable Neil Parish was caught watching explicit porn while being paid for his presence in the House of Commons. What, I wonder, could the likes of Parish get up to in a sealed, private room in the company of a dozen other "members"?
Masonry operates like a virus, with self-replicating cells that multiply (by invitation) and quickly expands to occupy any welcoming environment (police, law, politics) until the host is hopelessly infected.
One freemason in Parliament is too many, because a hundred will never be enough. Like the government it infests, the prime function of masonry is simply to survive and grow stronger. While its practitioners shelter, safe from prying eyes, in panelled, soundproof rooms that open and close upon the corridors of power, there is no way of knowing where freemasonry stops and government begins.
Masonry is the perfect hiding place for every kind of pedophile, psychopath and reprobate
ReplyDelete100% correct. Secret societies are secret for a reason. Masonry is an open invitation to perverts, crooks and con-artists.
ReplyDelete