HOW TO DESTROY EUROPE -ONE PIPE AT A TIME

With methane still belching into the seas off the shore of Denmark, the globalist/media spin-cycle is whirling at warp-speed to conceal the implications of NATO's game-changing attack on the Nordstream gas pipelines. The absurd suggestion that Russia itself laid the explosives is now being circulated by everyone from the BBC to Sky News. Who on earth will swallow such hogwash?

Today, let's dismantle the Alice-In-Wonderland world of mainstream media and look for some real insight into what exactly was done, plus how and why.

There are two Nordstream undersea pipelines, which run in tandem from St Petersburg in Russia to northern Germany. This week both pipelines were attacked with explosives at a point close by the Danish island of Bornholm.

The BBC's report on the event -which deserves some kind of award for brazen stupidity- is headlined Nordstream 1 How Russia is cutting gas supplies to Europe, and begins:

"Nord Stream 1, Russia's largest gas pipeline to Europe, has been closed indefinitely after a number of leaks were found in it and a parallel pipeline, Nord Stream 2. EU leaders say the leaks were caused deliberately. Russia denies it's to blame.

The BBC's report wambles to a limp end without one word of reference to the obvious, undeniable truth that this blatant act of sabotage was carried out by the Anglo/American war-mongers who engineered the Ukraine war. Naturally, none of the BBC's army of overpaid hacks was willing to put their name to the feeble Nordstream non-story. BBC news, we suppose, emerges fully-formed out of thin air.

The mere idea that Russia would make a massive investment in trans-european undersea gas-pipes and then blow them up is imbecilic. If Russia was so determined to cut off their contribution to the european energy supply (35% of the EU total) they only had to turn off the taps.

America, on the other hand, publicly stated its intention to shut down the Nordstream pipeline in retaliation, if Ukraine was invaded (as we reportedHERE). The motive, then, is crystal clear -although invisible to the BBC- and as it happens, the NATO alliance was perfectly positioned to supply both the means and the opportunity for an underwater attack on the Nordstream pipelines. Consider the following 'coincidences'.

WHY BORHOLM?

According to SEAPOWER magazine, in June of this year the Danish island of Borholm was the focus of a NATO naval exercise involving explosives experts from the US Navy 6th fleet and Unmanned Underwater Vehicles. (UUVs) Quote :"Experimentation was conducted off the coast of Bornholm, Denmark, with participants from Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific, Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport, and Mine Warfare Readiness and Effectiveness Measuring all under the direction of U.S. 6th Fleet Task Force 68. " [CLICK HERE to read the SEAPOWER article]

Also known as "underwater drones" UUVs are the latest must-have in the international arms-race. GlobalNewswire reports that the UUV market will be worth $4.4 BILLION by 2025. The list of major investors in the global UUV market includes a who's who of notorious arms-manufacturers : BAE Systems (UK) Konsberg (Norway) Lockheed Martin (US) Northorp Grummon Corp. (US) and Boeing (US) [DETAILS HERE]

A NATO Naval exercise of the kind described by SEAPOWER (the official publication of the Navy League of the United States) would supply perfect cover for underwater reconnaissance missions and subsequent sabotage. That such a military exercise took place off the shore of Borholm -just a few miles from the pipeline explosions- seems either highly relevant or an unbelievable coincidence.

Perhaps it was also coincidental that the British ship RRS Sir David Attenborough -one of the most sophisticated 'research' vessels in the world- arrived in Danish territorial waters two weeks ago and has remained there since for no apparent reason. [Details HERE]. This is no ordinary boat. Designed (we are told) for polar exploration, she is packed with the latest high-tech equipment. Significantly, the RRS designation (Royal Research Ship) means she operates in the financial twilight-zone between the military and industrial sectors.

Further to the conspicuous NATO naval presence in the sabotage zone, the nature of the Danish Straits makes them impossible to navigate by submarine. Therefore, any underwater attack on the pipelines would have required either trained Navy divers and/or UUVs. We can say with certainty that ample supplies of both the manpower and UUV technology were brought to Borholm in June, by NATO. 

WHO'S NEXT? 

Mainland Europe is now facing an escalating energy crisis beyond imagining just a year ago. Germany -the biggest EU consumer of Russian gas- is now at the mercy of the military/industrial complex that effectively controls US foreign policy. The use of military force against industrial targets will likely escalate from this point forward. 

Ominously, the UK and USA possess a range of vulnerable undersea assets, from the channel tunnel to the transatlantic cables that link banks and naval vessels alike. Satellite systems and internet service providers will prove similarly tempting targets. The Nordstream pipe-bombs may be the turning point in what could become a sequence of disastrous international disruptions.

Despite endless 1984-style announcements of 'heroic Ukraine military breakthroughs' four Russian-controlled regions of Ukraine -Luhansk, Donetsk, Khersen and Zaporizhzhia- began voting last Friday in what Russia describes as referendums. Loyalty to either Russia or Ukraine is the voter's choice. The Guardian newspaper described these votes in scathing terms: So-called “referendums” are under way in areas of Ukraine occupied by Russian troops, with residents told to vote on proposals for the four Ukrainian regions to declare independence and then join Russia.

Funny old world isn't it? I seem to recall that in 2016 a so-called "referendum" was under way in the United Kingdom with residents told to vote on proposals for the four UK regions to declare independence and exit the European Union.

However, as the Ukrainians have probably realised by now, if voting changed anything they wouldn't allow it in the first place.

Ian Andrew-Patrick

99endof supports no political party or ideology. The individual is what matters here, and the freedoms for which we are now obliged to fight. Many thanks to readers for supporting 99EndOf throughout the last two years. Our existence depends on visitors spreading the links and information among friends and colleagues. Please do likewise whenever you can. This is a time to prepare ourselves for what is inevitably coming. Your help, as always, is very much appreciated.